Sources · Tested · Episode 1

History Repeats Every 80 Years. We Tested It.

Every figure shown on screen in this episode, with the document, page and date it comes from, and a label for how strong the evidence is.

We checked Strauss and Howe's crisis cycle against their own crisis dates, two trust surveys, US recessions and banking crises, and the book's dated forecasts. The strict 80-year schedule doesn't hold, and these checks give no reliable date for the next crisis.

Published
22 September 2026
Length
11:16
Figures checked
26 September 2026
Documents
21

Verdict

  • DOESN’T HOLD“Strict timing: a new crisis every 80 years, give or take 10”
  • PARTLY“Predictions: the book's dated forecasts, with one scorable timing claim”

On screen in this episode

  • DOCUMENTED16The document shows it, and you can check it yourself.
  • CLAIMED24Someone says so, but nothing independent backs it up.
  • NOT SHOWN14Something that matters is missing from every source we checked.
  • OUR CALCULATION23Our own arithmetic from the sourced numbers. The method is below.
  • missing1A value is absent from the dataset. It is shown as missing, never as zero.

How we label evidence

NOT SHOWNWhat isn’t shown

  • 3:30NEXT CRISIS: ? · UNEVEN SPACING
  • 4:08DECLINE ≠ REPEATING CYCLE
  • 4:11OUR TEST · FALL AT EVERY CHANGE? · REBUILD · The staircase was ours.
  • 4:41DECLINE OBSERVED · INCONCLUSIVE
  • 5:41OUR SPREADSHEET · DESCRIPTIVE ROW 1–5 · NOT SEPARATE CRISES
  • 6:19BROADER CYCLE: INCONCLUSIVE
  • 6:43LATER EVENT CHOICE · NOT A SPECIFIC CRASH FORECAST
  • 6:592020 CLIMAX · NOT IDENTIFIED
  • 7:15WHAT COUNTS AS A GATE? · UNDEFINED ≠ A FAIR MISS
  • 7:31Predictive skill is not established by one match
  • 9:29BIRTHDAY → JOB? · LABELS ≠ PERSONALITY TEST
  • 10:1002 TRUST CYCLE · INCONCLUSIVE
  • 10:1503 ECONOMIC CYCLE · INCONCLUSIVE
  • 10:40NEXT CRISIS: ? · 80.0000… · No reliable date established by these checks

On screen, in order

  1. 0:00

    EVERY 80 YEARS? · 1945 · 1865 · 1783 · SELECTED WAR END DATES

    DOCUMENTED

    The years in which World War II, the Civil War and the American Revolution ended for the United States.

    • [1] VA fact sheet, America's Wars, American Revolution (1775-1783); Civil War (1861-1865); World War II (1941–1945)
  2. 0:03

    80 YEARS · 82 YEARS

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [1] VA fact sheet, America's Wars

    How we worked this out

  3. 0:10

    2026 · 81 YEARS LATER

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [1] VA fact sheet, America's Wars

    How we worked this out

  4. 0:16

    ROUTE 80 · NEXT: ROUGHLY NOW

    CLAIMED

    The claim the episode tests, in its popular 80-year form. The 1997 book projected its current Crisis for about 2005 to 2026; Howe's 2023 book puts a great turning point before the mid-2030s.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [3] City Journal review, 2023, quoting the 2023 book: “sometime before the mid-2030s”
  5. 0:37

    TRUST IN GOVERNMENT · 1958 · 2025 · Pew Research Center / 1958–2025 (small chart on a laptop screen)

    DOCUMENTED
    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table and smoothed trend line
  6. 0:46

    STRAUSS + HOWE · HISTORY + ECONOMICS

    CLAIMED

    Neil Howe's speaker biography lists graduate degrees in economics (M.A., 1978) and history (M.Phil., 1979) from Yale.

    • [5] Hedgeye Macrocosm 2015 invitation, PDF page 3, speaker biography
  7. 0:49

    CAPITOL STEPS

    DOCUMENTED

    William Strauss co-founded the Capitol Steps, a political comedy troupe.

    • [6] Washington Post obituary, 2007
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, author biography
  8. 0:57

    THE FOURTH TURNING · 1997 · AN AMERICAN PROPHECY

    DOCUMENTED
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997), catalogue record: “The fourth turning : an American prophecy”, New York: Broadway Books, 1997
  9. 1:06

    80–100 · YEARS / ONE LAP

    CLAIMED

    The authors' model.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”: “roughly eighty to one hundred years”
  10. 1:12

    SAECULUM · HIGH / SPRING · AWAKENING / SUMMER · UNRAVELING / AUTUMN · CRISIS / WINTER · THE AUTHORS’ MODEL / APPROXIMATELY TWO DECADES PER SEASON

    CLAIMED

    In the excerpt a new turning arrives “every two decades or so”, four turnings make a saeculum, and together they form “history's seasonal rhythm”.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  11. 1:20

    THE HIGH · SPRING · STRONG INSTITUTIONS · PEOPLE PULL TOGETHER

    CLAIMED

    The book describes the High as an era of strengthening institutions and weakening individualism.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  12. 1:26

    THE HIGH · 1946–1964

    CLAIMED

    The authors' model. The protest placards that follow are illustrations.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, table of contents: “The First Turning-American High, 1946-1964”
  13. 1:34

    AWAKENING · 1964–1984

    CLAIMED

    The authors' model.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, table of contents: “The Second Turning-Consciousness Revolution, 1964-1984”
  14. 1:45

    UNRAVELING · 1984 → ~2005 · 2005 WAS PROJECTED

    CLAIMED

    The end year was the authors' projection in 1997.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, table of contents: “The Third Turning-Culture Wars, 1984-2005?”; excerpt: “due to expire around the middle of the Oh-Oh decade”
  15. 1:55

    THE AUTHORS’ AMERICAN WINTERS · 1773 REVOLUTION · 1860 CIVIL WAR · 1929 DEPRESSION + WWII

    CLAIMED

    Start years of the authors' Crisis eras: 1773–1794, 1860–1865 and 1929–1946. The excerpt names the sparks: the Boston Tea Party, John Brown's raid and execution, and Black Tuesday. These are not the war-end years in the opening.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”
  16. 2:02

    FORECAST IN 1997 · ~2005 · NEXT CRISIS START

    CLAIMED

    The 1997 book expected a spark to start the next Crisis mood around 2005.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt: “due to expire around the middle of the Oh-Oh decade”
  17. 2:13

    PROPHET · NOMAD · HERO · ARTIST

    CLAIMED

    The authors' four generational archetypes.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [8] Howe interview, 2009, Howe describes the four archetypes
  18. 2:48

    1459 · 1569 · 1675 · 1773 · 1860 · 1929

    CLAIMED

    Start years of the authors' Crisis eras: Wars of the Roses, Armada Crisis, Glorious Revolution, American Revolution, Civil War, and Great Depression and World War II.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  19. 2:52

    110 · 106 · 98 · 87 · 69 · YEARS BETWEEN CRISIS STARTS · 69–110 YEARS

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  20. 3:05

    MEAN GAP · 91 · YEARS · WITH PROJECTED 2005

    OUR CALCULATION

    Without the projected 2005 the five historical gaps average 94 years.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  21. 3:12

    OUR RULE: 70–90 · 91

    OUR CALCULATION

    Our own pass mark of 80 years, give or take 10. The mean of 91 is one year outside it.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  22. 3:19

    BOOK: 80–100

    CLAIMED

    The authors' model.

    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt: “roughly eighty to one hundred years”
  23. 3:22

    80–100 YEARS · SERVICE WINDOW (calendar of 80 to 100, 91 circled) · 91 FITS · Our stricter rule ≠ the book’s whole claim

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt: “roughly eighty to one hundred years”

    How we worked this out

  24. 3:30

    NEXT CRISIS: ? · UNEVEN SPACING

    NOT SHOWN

    Gaps of 69 to 110 years do not give a reliable date for the next crisis.

    • Checked[2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  25. 3:43

    GOVERNMENT · OTHER PEOPLE · Pew 1958–2025 / NORC GSS 1972–2024 · different questions

    DOCUMENTED

    Pew's series asks about trusting the government in Washington; the GSS asks whether most people can be trusted.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, question wording
    • [9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024, codebook, variable TRUST
  26. 3:46

    TRUST IN THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT · TO DO WHAT IS RIGHT, MOST / ALL OF THE TIME · 1958 · 73% · ONE HIGH-PERIOD READING · Pew Research Center / December 1958

    DOCUMENTED

    One poll reading, from the National Election Study as listed by Pew. It is Pew's only reading before 1964, the boundary year between the authors' High and Awakening. Pew's wording is “just about always” or “most of the time”.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table: 12/01/1958, NES, 73
  27. 3:55

    AWAKENING · UNRAVELING · CRISIS · 1958–2025 (chart of Pew's smoothed trend with the authors' turnings shaded)

    DOCUMENTED

    The shaded periods are the authors' turnings: Awakening 1964–1984, Unraveling 1984–2005, Crisis from 2005.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, smoothed trend line, 163 readings
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, table of contents
  28. 3:59

    41% · 35% · 23% · MEAN OF POLL READINGS · PERIOD MEANS: OUR CALCULATION

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table, 163 readings

    How we worked this out

  29. 4:03

    SEPT 2025 · 17%

    DOCUMENTED

    2% said “just about always” and 15% “most of the time”.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table: 9/28/2025, Pew Research Center, 17
  30. 4:08

    DECLINE ≠ REPEATING CYCLE

    NOT SHOWN

    Pew's series shows a decline since 1958, but it covers less than one 80-year cycle, so it cannot show a repeat.

    • Checked[4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government
  31. 4:11

    OUR TEST · FALL AT EVERY CHANGE? · REBUILD · The staircase was ours.

    NOT SHOWN

    Our first test expected trust to fall at every change of turning. That staircase was our own reading, not a prediction found in the book passages we checked; the excerpt says that in past Crises “Leaders led, and people trusted them.” The test was withdrawn on 20 September 2026.

    • Checked[2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”
  32. 4:24

    HOW MUCH HISTORY DO WE HAVE? · PEW / GOVERNMENT · ONE HIGH READING (bar from 1958 to 2025 on a 1946–2040 timeline)

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table

    How we worked this out

  33. 4:27

    GSS / OTHER PEOPLE · NO HIGH READINGS (bar from 1972)

    missing

    The GSS began in 1972, after the authors' High (1946–1964), so its average for the High is missing, not zero.

    • Missing in[9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024, first conducted in 1972
  34. 4:36

    ONE 80-YEAR LAP

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government
    • [9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024

    How we worked this out

  35. 4:41

    DECLINE OBSERVED · INCONCLUSIVE

    NOT SHOWN

    The video's verdict on a repeating trust cycle is INCONCLUSIVE. Both surveys show a decline, but neither covers 80 years and the GSS has no High readings, so a repeating cycle is not shown.

    • Checked[4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government
    • [9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024
  36. 5:03

    03 / RECESSION STARTS · 44 · RECESSION PEAK YEARS · 1796–2026

    OUR CALCULATION

    Each recession is counted in the calendar year of the business-cycle peak before it; the recession itself starts the month after the peak.

    • [10] NBER business cycle dates, peak months June 1857 to February 2020
    • [11] Davis, NBER Working Paper 11157, Table 1, p. 22

    How we worked this out

  37. 5:13

    ~1/5 · YEARS IN “WINTER”

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  38. 5:16

    44 DARTS · ~9 IN WINTER

    OUR CALCULATION

    An illustration of the equal-years baseline, not an experiment we ran.

    • [10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [11] Davis, NBER Working Paper 11157

    How we worked this out

  39. 5:26

    RECESSION STARTS IN WINTER · ~9 UNIFORM-YEAR BASELINE · 7 OBSERVED · NO EXTRA CLUSTERING

    OUR CALCULATION

    As the screen notes, this counts starts, not severity, and recession risk is not the same every year.

    • [10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [11] Davis, NBER Working Paper 11157

    How we worked this out

  40. 5:41

    OUR SPREADSHEET · DESCRIPTIVE ROW 1–5 · NOT SEPARATE CRISES

    NOT SHOWN

    Our first banking count used the 15 US rows of Reinhart and Rogoff's Table A5, which are historical summaries. The paper's own start-year list, Table A3, has 12 US dates, and the two lists differ. That selection was withdrawn on 20 September 2026.

    • Checked[12] Reinhart & Rogoff, NBER Working Paper 14587, Appendix Table A5, pp. A5-17–A5-18 (United States); Appendix Table A3, pp. 58–61
  41. 5:53

    BANKING CRISIS EPISODES · 16 EPISODES

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file, Excel file, Sheet1, United States, column “Banking Crisis”

    How we worked this out

  42. 5:58

    2.5 · UNIFORM-YEAR BASELINE · 4 · BEGIN IN WINTER

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file

    How we worked this out

  43. 6:02

    1.58× / CLEARS 1.5× BAR

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file

    How we worked this out

  44. 6:08

    THE RESULT DEPENDS ON THE LIST · RECESSIONS · NO EXTRA CLUSTERING

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [11] Davis, NBER Working Paper 11157

    How we worked this out

  45. 6:15

    BANKING · CLEARS THIS COUNT

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file

    How we worked this out

  46. 6:19

    BROADER CYCLE: INCONCLUSIVE

    NOT SHOWN

    The video's verdict on an economic-crisis cycle is INCONCLUSIVE: recessions show no extra clustering, banking clears our bar on one small list, and the answer depends on which chronology and years are used.

    • Checked[13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file
    • [10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [12] Reinhart & Rogoff, NBER Working Paper 14587
  47. 6:30

    2005 · FORECAST IN 1997

    CLAIMED

    The 1997 book expected a sudden spark to start a Crisis mood around 2005.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  48. 6:34

    2008 · HOWE’S LATER CHOICE

    CLAIMED

    Howe's later dating of the start. The on-screen source line cites Howe (2023); the 2008 dating is documented here from his 2019 interview.

    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019, Howe: “now we would date it 2008 with the GFC”
  49. 6:37

    3 YEARS · PARTIAL CREDIT

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019

    How we worked this out

  50. 6:43

    LATER EVENT CHOICE · NOT A SPECIFIC CRASH FORECAST

    NOT SHOWN

    Howe named the 2008 financial crisis afterwards. The 1997 passages we checked expect a Crisis mood around 2005, not a specific financial crash.

    • Checked[2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019
  51. 6:52

    2020 CLIMAX · 2026 RESOLUTION · Conditional on the initial spark arriving on schedule

    CLAIMED

    In the 1997 book both dates depend on the Crisis catalyst arriving on schedule.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  52. 6:59

    2020 CLIMAX · NOT IDENTIFIED

    NOT SHOWN

    We found no climax event named by the authors in the sources we checked, and we do not pick one ourselves.

    • Checked[2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019
  53. 7:01

    2026 RESOLUTION · OPEN THROUGH 2028

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  54. 7:07

    BEFORE 2025

    CLAIMED

    The 1997 book says America will pass through a “great gate in history” sometime before 2025.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  55. 7:10

    BEFORE MID-2030s

    CLAIMED

    Howe's 2023 book moves the great gate to before the mid-2030s.

    • [15] Howe, The Fourth Turning Is Here (2023), excerpt
    • [3] City Journal review, 2023, quoting the 2023 book: “sometime before the mid-2030s, America will pass through a great gate in history”
  56. 7:15

    WHAT COUNTS AS A GATE? · UNDEFINED ≠ A FAIR MISS

    NOT SHOWN

    Neither passage defines an event that would count as the great gate, so the claim is left unscored rather than called a miss.

    • Checked[2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [3] City Journal review, 2023
  57. 7:24

    1 · PARTIAL TIMING MATCH · 2005 → 2008 PARTLY

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019

    How we worked this out

  58. 7:31

    Predictive skill is not established by one match

    NOT SHOWN

    One scored timing claim is too few to show skill at forecasting.

  59. 7:34

    POLITICAL VIOLENCE · ~1,600 · EVENTS · SINCE 1780

    DOCUMENTED

    Rounded from 1,590 events.

    • [16] Turchin, Journal of Peace Research 2012, abstract: 1,590 political violence events, 1780–2010
  60. 7:44

    1870 · 1920 · 1970 · ~50 YRS · ~50 YRS

    DOCUMENTED

    Peak years reported in the paper, not a series we rebuilt.

    • [16] Turchin, Journal of Peace Research 2012, abstract: a 50-year oscillation with peaks around 1870, 1920 and 1970
  61. 7:51

    POLITICAL VIOLENCE ≠ INSTITUTIONS + GENERATIONS

    DOCUMENTED

    Turchin counts political violence events; Strauss and Howe describe cycles of institutions and generations. The two measure different things.

    • [16] Turchin, Journal of Peace Research 2012, abstract
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt, “It's All Happened Before”
  62. 8:02

    2010 · FORECAST

    DOCUMENTED
    • [17] Turchin, Nature 2010, “The next decade is likely to be a period of growing instability in the United States and western Europe”
  63. 8:07

    2020 · AUTHORS’ ASSESSMENT · 2018 · DATA THROUGH · OBSERVATIONS · ENDS 2018 · NOT A VERDICT ON 2020 EVENTS

    DOCUMENTED

    Turchin and a co-author assessed Turchin's own 2010 forecast, using data that ended in 2018.

    • [18] Turchin & Korotayev, PLOS ONE 2020, Discussion: “The 2010 prediction was accurate”; “our data currently extends only into 2018”
  64. 8:17

    INDEPENDENT CHECKS

    DOCUMENTED

    A later study by another author tested key mechanisms of Turchin's theory on US data.

    • [19] Georgescu, PLOS ONE 2023, abstract: “The predictions are not supported by the data.”
  65. 8:39

    ORION / THE HUNTER · URSA MAJOR / THE BEAR · LIBRA / THE SCALES (illustrated star patterns)

    DOCUMENTED

    Star patterns redrawn and simplified from the IAU charts; the layout is not to scale.

    • [20] IAU constellation charts, charts ORI, UMA and LIB
  66. 8:46

    1773 · 1860 · 1929 · ? · THEORY BUILT HERE · FORECAST

    CLAIMED

    From the Revolution onward the authors describe three completed Crises and a proposed current one. The first three were history when the theory was written; the fourth was a forecast.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  67. 9:06

    1943–1960 · PROPHET

    CLAIMED

    The authors' label for the Boom generation.

    • [8] Howe interview, 2009, Boomers, “born between 1943 and 1960”
  68. 9:15

    1961–1981 · NOMAD

    CLAIMED

    The authors' label for Generation X.

    • [8] Howe interview, 2009, Gen Xers, “born between 1961 and 1981”
  69. 9:20

    1982 → · HERO

    CLAIMED

    The authors' label for the Millennial generation.

    • [8] Howe interview, 2009, Millennials, “born from 1982”
  70. 9:25

    ARTIST (the generation after the Millennials)

    CLAIMED

    The authors' label for the next generation.

    • [8] Howe interview, 2009, a new Artist generation born from around 2004 or 2005
  71. 9:29

    BIRTHDAY → JOB? · LABELS ≠ PERSONALITY TEST

    NOT SHOWN

    The archetypes are the authors' labels for whole generations; the sources we checked do not test them as a measure of individual personality.

    • Checked[8] Howe interview, 2009
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  72. 9:36

    COMPARE LIKE WITH LIKE · GENERATION · GETTING OLDER · SHARED EVENTS

    DOCUMENTED

    Pew Research Center's guidance: compare generations at similar ages and separate them from events that affect all ages.

    • [21] Pew Research Center, generations, 2023, compare generations “at similar stages of life”; “period effects”
  73. 10:05

    01 STRICT TIMING · DOESN’T HOLD

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)

    How we worked this out

  74. 10:10

    02 TRUST CYCLE · INCONCLUSIVE

    NOT SHOWN

    The video calls this check inconclusive: trust declined, but these records cannot show a repeating cycle.

    • Checked[4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government
    • [9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024
  75. 10:15

    03 ECONOMIC CYCLE · INCONCLUSIVE

    NOT SHOWN

    The video calls this check inconclusive: no extra clustering of recessions, banking clears our bar on one list, and a broader cycle is not shown.

    • Checked[10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file
  76. 10:22

    04 PREDICTIONS · PARTLY

    OUR CALCULATION
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019

    How we worked this out

  77. 10:31

    ANOMALY IN THE SEQUENCE · THE AUTHORS NOTE AN ANOMALY, TOO

    CLAIMED

    The 1997 book calls its Civil War cycle the only true anomaly: a short Crisis that produced no Hero generation.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  78. 10:40

    NEXT CRISIS: ? · 80.0000… · No reliable date established by these checks

    NOT SHOWN

    These checks do not establish a date for the next crisis.

Our calculations

  1. OUR CALCULATIONYears between the selected war end dates

    1865 − 1783 = 82 years; 1945 − 1865 = 80 years; 2026 − 1945 = 81 years. The end years are the last years of the American Revolution, the Civil War and World War II for the United States.

    • [1] VA fact sheet, America's Wars
  2. OUR CALCULATIONGaps between the authors' Crisis start years

    The Crisis eras start in 1459, 1569, 1675, 1773, 1860 and 1929, giving gaps of 110, 106, 98, 87 and 69 years (range 69–110, mean 94.0). Adding the book's 1997 projection of 2005 adds a gap of 76; the six gaps average 546 ÷ 6 = 91.0 years. Our original rule was 80 years, give or take 10: only two of the six gaps (87 and 76) fall within 70–90 and the mean does not, so the strict schedule grades DOESN'T HOLD. The mean of 91 is inside the book's own range of roughly 80 to 100 years. Reproducible with analysis/run_tests.py in our method repository.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, excerpt: “roughly eighty to one hundred years”
  3. OUR CALCULATIONTrust averages by turning

    Pew lists 163 poll readings from December 1958 to September 2025. Grouped by the authors' turnings, with a boundary year counted in the turning that starts that year: the High (to 1963) has one reading, 73% in 1958; the Awakening (1964–1983) has 19 readings averaging 40.6%; the Unraveling (1984–2004) 91 readings averaging 35.3%; the Crisis (from 2005) 52 readings averaging 22.7%. Shown rounded as 41%, 35% and 23%. Every reading counts once, so years with more polls weigh more. Reproducible with analysis/run_tests.py.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government, data table
    • [7] Publisher's page and excerpt, The Fourth Turning, table of contents
  4. OUR CALCULATIONHow much of an 80-year cycle the surveys cover

    Pew's series runs from 1958 to 2025 (67 years) and the GSS from 1972 to 2024 (52 years). Neither spans one 80-year cycle, so neither can show one repeating.

    • [4] Pew fact sheet, trust in government
    • [9] NORC General Social Survey 1972–2024
  5. OUR CALCULATIONRecession peak years against the calendar

    44 business-cycle peak years: Davis's 10 annual peaks from 1796 to 1839 (his alternative chronology) and the NBER's 34 monthly peaks from June 1857 to February 2020, each counted by calendar year. The authors' Crisis windows, both end years included, cover 46 of the 231 years from 1796 to 2026, about one fifth (2026 is a partial year). Expected with every year equally likely: 44 × 46 ÷ 231 = 8.76, shown as about 9. Observed: 7 (1860, 1865, 1929, 1937, 1945, 2007 and 2020). Ratio 7 ÷ 8.76 = 0.80, below our bar of 1.5. This is an expected value, not a simulation or a significance test. Reproducible with analysis/run_tests.py.

    • [10] NBER business cycle dates
    • [11] Davis, NBER Working Paper 11157, Table 1, p. 22
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  6. OUR CALCULATIONBanking crisis episodes against the calendar

    In the Harvard BFFS 2016 file the United States has a Banking Crisis value of 0 or 1 for every year from 1800 to 2014; 2015 and 2016 are n/a and left out. Each unbroken run of crisis years counts as one episode that starts in its first year, giving 16 episodes: 1814, 1817, 1825, 1837, 1841, 1857, 1861, 1864, 1873, 1884, 1893, 1907, 1914, 1929, 1984 and 2007. The Crisis windows cover 34 of the 215 years, so the equal-years expectation is 16 × 34 ÷ 215 = 2.53, shown as 2.5. Observed: 4 (1861, 1864, 1929, 2007). Ratio 4 ÷ 2.53 = 1.58, above our bar of 1.5. The grouping rule is ours. Reproducible with analysis/run_tests.py.

    • [13] Harvard BFFS global crisis data, 2016 file, Sheet1, United States, 1800–2016
    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
  7. OUR CALCULATIONScoring the dated predictions

    Our rule from the original method: a forecast “around” a year is a hit within ±2 years and partial within ±3 to 5 years, judged against the event the author later named. Crisis start: forecast around 2005, Howe later named 2008, three years later, so partial. Climax around 2020: no event named by the authors in the sources we checked, not scored. Resolution around 2026: the hit window runs through 2028, still open. Great gate before 2025: no rule for what counts as the gate, not scored. One scored claim, and it is partial, so the grade is PARTLY. The scoring sheet is PREDICTIONS.md in our method repository.

    • [2] Strauss & Howe, The Fourth Turning (1997)
    • [14] Howe, MacroVoices interview, 2019

Documents

  • Method, data, calculations and the correction log are public at github.com/mikehoolio/owlfox-tested-01. Running analysis/run_tests.py there reproduces the schedule, trust and economic calculations; the prediction scoring is in PREDICTIONS.md.
  • These are exploratory checks. The method was revised on 20 September 2026, after results had been seen; every change is logged in the repository.
  • The video gives two checks, the trust cycle and the economic cycle, the verdict INCONCLUSIVE. That is not one of the verdicts used on this page, so those results are listed as NOT SHOWN.
  • Archive-style photographs in the video are AI-generated illustrations, not documentary images.
  1. [1]

    U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

    America's Wars (interactive fact sheet)

    Retrieved 26 September 2026

    The page says it was last updated on 15 July 2026.

    Lists the American Revolution as 1775–1783, the Civil War as 1861–1865 and World War II as 1941–1945.

    Used at 0:00 · 0:03 · 0:10

  2. [2]

    Broadway Books

    The Fourth Turning: An American Prophecy (William Strauss and Neil Howe · ISBN 055306682X)

    Published 1997 · Retrieved 20 September 2026

    Internet Archive record of the 1997 first edition, a borrow-only scan. The record itself was re-opened on 26 September 2026.

    The dated passages used here (the Crisis dates, the 2005 catalyst, the 2020 climax and 2026 resolution, the great gate before 2025, the Civil War anomaly) were read in Open Library's public search-inside snippets on 17 and 20 September 2026; the snippets give no page numbers. On 26 September 2026 that search required human verification, so they were not re-read.

    Used at 0:16 · 0:57 · 1:12 · 1:20 · 1:55 · 2:02 · 2:13 · 2:48 · 2:52 · 3:05 · 3:12 · 3:30 · 4:11 · 5:13 · 6:30 · 6:37 · 6:43 · 6:52 · 6:59 · 7:01 · 7:07 · 7:15 · 7:24 · 8:46 · 9:29 · 10:05 · 10:22 · 10:31

  3. [3]

    City Journal

    Present at the Destruction (review of Neil Howe, The Fourth Turning Is Here) (N. S. Lyons)

    Published 3 September 2023 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    A review that quotes the 2023 book; used here to confirm the book's wording.

    Used at 0:16 · 7:10 · 7:15

  4. [4]

    Pew Research Center

    Public Trust in Government: 1958-2025 (Fact sheet)

    Published 4 December 2025 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Question: trust the government in Washington to do what is right “just about always” or “most of the time”. The data table lists 163 poll readings from December 1958 to September 2025 by Pew Research Center, the National Election Studies, Gallup, ABC/Washington Post, CBS/New York Times and CNN. The smoothed line is a three-survey moving average from 1976 to February 2025; earlier readings and September 2025 are single polls.

    Used at 0:37 · 3:43 · 3:46 · 3:55 · 3:59 · 4:03 · 4:08 · 4:24 · 4:36 · 4:41 · 10:10

  5. [5]

    Hedgeye Risk Management

    Macrocosm 2015 invitation and speaker biographies

    Published 2015 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Event invitation (PDF). Its speaker biography of Neil Howe is the source for his education.

    Used at 0:46

  6. [6]

    The Washington Post

    Bill Strauss, 60; Political Insider Who Stepped Over Into Comedy

    Published 19 December 2007 · Retrieved 21 September 2026

    Date from the article's address. The site did not respond to our requests on 26 September 2026; the retrieval date is the production's source check.

    Used at 0:49

  7. [7]

    Penguin Random House Higher Education

    The Fourth Turning (book page with table of contents, excerpt and author biography) (ISBN 9780767900461)

    Published 29 December 1997 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Page for the paperback edition, on sale 29 December 1997, which now carries the later subtitle What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America's Next Rendezvous with Destiny. The excerpt is marked © 1998.

    Used at 0:49 · 1:06 · 1:12 · 1:20 · 1:26 · 1:34 · 1:45 · 1:55 · 2:02 · 3:19 · 3:22 · 3:55 · 4:11 · 7:51

  8. [8]

    Streetwise Reports

    Into the Fourth Turning (Casey Research interview with Neil Howe)

    Published 8 October 2009 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Used at 2:13 · 9:06 · 9:15 · 9:20 · 9:25 · 9:29

  9. [9]

    NORC at the University of Chicago

    General Social Survey 1972–2024, cumulative data file (release 3a)

    Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Variable TRUST: “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted or that you can't be too careful in dealing with people?” The survey was first conducted in 1972. Yearly percentages weighted with WTSSPS are our calculation from the cumulative file, downloaded on 17 September 2026.

    Used at 3:43 · 4:27 · 4:36 · 4:41 · 10:10

  10. [10]

    National Bureau of Economic Research

    US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions

    Retrieved 26 September 2026

    The page says the business cycle data were last updated on 14 March 2023.

    Used at 5:03 · 5:16 · 5:26 · 6:08 · 6:19 · 10:15

  11. [11]

    National Bureau of Economic Research

    An Improved Annual Chronology of U.S. Business Cycles since the 1790's (Joseph H. Davis · NBER Working Paper 11157 · doi:10.3386/w11157)

    Published February 2005 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Working paper issued in February 2005; published in the Journal of Economic History in 2006 (vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 103–121), which the video cites as Davis (2006).

    Used at 5:03 · 5:16 · 5:26 · 6:08

  12. [12]

    National Bureau of Economic Research

    Banking Crises: An Equal Opportunity Menace (Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff · NBER Working Paper 14587 · doi:10.3386/w14587)

    Published December 2008 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    The source of the banking list the episode withdrew. The video description links the authors' Harvard page for the same 2008 paper; that page refused automated access on 26 September 2026.

    Used at 5:41 · 6:19

  13. [13]

    Harvard Business School, Behavioral Finance & Financial Stability

    Global Crises Data by Country

    Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Data collected by Carmen Reinhart with Ken Rogoff, Christoph Trebesch and Vincent Reinhart. The file offered for download is dated 23 September 2016 (SHA-256 7b74a710942bb311223be23f84e305994ee23575af821f4169d97b88e7fe400e).

    Used at 5:53 · 5:58 · 6:02 · 6:15 · 6:19 · 10:15

  14. [14]

    MacroVoices

    Neil Howe: Super-bullish the U.S.A in the 2030s. But between now and then… (Interview transcript)

    Published 4 April 2019 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Used at 6:34 · 6:37 · 6:43 · 6:59 · 7:24 · 10:22

  15. [15]

    Porter & Co.

    Our Rendezvous With Destiny (first chapter of Neil Howe, The Fourth Turning Is Here, Simon & Schuster, 2023)

    Published 23 August 2024 · Retrieved 20 September 2026

    The excerpt was open to read when the production checked it on 20 September 2026. On 26 September 2026 the page showed only its introduction; the rest is for paying members.

    Used at 7:10

  16. [16]

    Journal of Peace Research

    Dynamics of political instability in the United States, 1780–2010 (Peter Turchin · vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 577–591)

    Published July 2012 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    The publisher's page refused automated access on 26 September 2026; the abstract was read from the article's DOI metadata record (Crossref).

    Used at 7:34 · 7:44 · 7:51

  17. [17]
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
  20. [20]

    International Astronomical Union

    Constellation charts: Orion, Ursa Major and Libra

    Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Used at 8:39

  21. [21]

    Pew Research Center

    How Pew Research Center will report on generations moving forward (Kim Parker)

    Published 22 May 2023 · Retrieved 26 September 2026

    Used at 9:36

Corrections

  1. 26 September 2026 · 3:46

    Was: The trust card from 3:46 to 4:11 describes Pew’s question as trusting the government to do what is right “most / all of the time”.

    Now: Pew’s wording is “just about always” or “most of the time”. The figures are unchanged.

    Corrected in: The episode’s source page and the video description

  2. 26 September 2026 · 5:03

    Was: The titles “RECESSION STARTS” from 5:02 to 5:41 count the years of business-cycle peaks.

    Now: They are peak years; NBER dates a recession from the month after a peak. Counting those months instead gives the same result.

    Corrected in: The episode’s source page and the video description

  3. 26 September 2026 · 6:34

    Was: Source lines from 6:30 to 7:34 credit Neil Howe’s later dating of the crisis to 2008 to “Howe (2023)”.

    Now: The source we verified for that dating is Neil Howe’s MacroVoices interview of 4 April 2019.

    Corrected in: The episode’s source page and the video description

Found an error? Email [email protected] with the time stamp and your source, or leave a comment under the video.

Data and licences

  • Pew Research Center bears no responsibility for the analyses or interpretations of the data presented here. The opinions expressed herein, including any implications for policy, are those of the author and not of Pew Research Center.
  • General Social Survey data: NORC at the University of Chicago, GSS 1972–2024 cumulative file, release 3a, variable TRUST weighted with WTSSPS. Only yearly weighted percentages are used.
  • Our code, text and derived tables in github.com/mikehoolio/owlfox-tested-01 are licensed CC BY 4.0. Third-party data stay under their providers' terms.